|
31 |
Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles Enthalten in Scientometrics Bd. 107, 2.2.2016, Nr. 1, date:4.2016: 15-26
|
|
|
32 |
Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics Enthalten in International orthopaedics Bd. 47, 7.2.2023, Nr. 3, date:3.2023: 605-609
|
|
|
33 |
Redefining the paradigm: incentivizing the peer review process for scientific advancement Enthalten in Intensive care medicine Bd. 50, 13.6.2024, Nr. 8, date:8.2024: 1320-1322
|
|
|
34 |
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling Enthalten in Research integrity and peer review Bd. 8, 24.4.2023, Nr. 1, date:12.2023: 1-9
|
|
|
35 |
What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals Enthalten in Scientometrics Bd. 128, 30.3.2023, Nr. 5, date:5.2023: 2763-2776
|
|