|
31 |
Ethical limits and suggestions for improving the use of AI in scientific research, academic publishing, and the peer review process, based on deontological and consequentialist viewpoints
Enthalten in Discover education Bd. 4, 16.7.2025, Nr. 1, date:12.2025: 1-27
|
|
|
|
32 |
Impact of author characteristics on outcomes of single- versus double-blind peer review: a systematic review of comparative studies in scientific abstracts and publications
Enthalten in Scientometrics Bd. 130, 16.12.2024, Nr. 1, date:1.2025: 399-421
|
|
|
|
33 |
Peer Review and Scientific Publishing in Times of Web 2.0
Enthalten in Publishing research quarterly Bd. 30, 21.2.2014, Nr. 1, date:3.2014: 39-49
|
|
|
|
34 |
Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics Bd. 29, 28.6.2023, Nr. 4, date:8.2023: 1-14
|
|
|
|
35 |
Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles
Enthalten in Scientometrics Bd. 107, 2.2.2016, Nr. 1, date:4.2016: 15-26
|
|
|
|
36 |
Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics
Enthalten in International orthopaedics Bd. 47, 7.2.2023, Nr. 3, date:3.2023: 605-609
|
|
|
|
37 |
Redefining the paradigm: incentivizing the peer review process for scientific advancement
Enthalten in Intensive care medicine Bd. 50, 13.6.2024, Nr. 8, date:8.2024: 1320-1322
|
|
|
|
38 |
Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling
Enthalten in Research integrity and peer review Bd. 8, 24.4.2023, Nr. 1, date:12.2023: 1-9
|
|
|
|
39 |
What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals
Enthalten in Scientometrics Bd. 128, 30.3.2023, Nr. 5, date:5.2023: 2763-2776
|
|
Administration
