|
11 |
Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers
Enthalten in Science and engineering ethics 4.11.2020: 1-9
|
|
|
|
12 |
Towards a New Peer Review Concept for Scientific Computing ensuring Technical Quality, Software Sustainability, and Result Reproducibility
Enthalten in Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics Bd. 19, 2019, Nr. 1. 4 S.
|
|
|
|
13 |
Enhancing Scientific Communication Skills: a Real-World Simulation in a Tertiary-Level Life Science Class Using E-Learning Technology in Biomedical Literature Perception, Reflective Review Writing on a Clinical Issue, and Self and Peer Assessments
Enthalten in Research in science education 13.12.2018: 1-23
|
|
|
|
14 |
On the effectiveness of the scientific peer-review system: a case study of the Journal of High Energy Physics
Enthalten in International journal on digital libraries 15.6.2018: 1-15
|
|
|
15 |
Scientific Peer Review
Starck, Johannes M.. - Wiesbaden : Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2017, 1st edition 2017
|
|
|
|
16 |
Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
Enthalten in Scientometrics 3.4.2017: 1-21
|
|
|
|
17 |
Censoring government scientists and the role of consensus in science advice
Enthalten in European Molecular Biology Organization: EMBO reports Bd. 16, 2015, Nr. 3: 263-266. 4 S.
|
|
|
|
18 |
From funding agencies to scientific agency
Enthalten in European Molecular Biology Organization: EMBO reports Bd. 15, 2014, Nr. 2: 131-133. 3 S.
|
|
|
|
19 |
Empfehlungen für die Begutachtung von wissenschaftlichen Manuskripten im „Peer-Review“-Prozess
Enthalten in Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie Bd. 44, 2012, Nr. 04: 193-197
|
|
|
|
20 |
Can we test for bias in scientific peer review?
Bonn : IZA, 2008
|
|
Administration
